shashaank
05-14-2008, 07:27 AM
http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1309974_aqwmu/_Fumoffu_02_www.cooldbz01-tn.png
http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1309975_yzddd/nic_Fumoffu_02.DVD_H26402-tn.png
One of the screenshot is of 450kbps one and another is of original KAA's release.
There is certainly difference in the two pictures. But I cannot find any appreciable difference, without magnification.
Since true quality test is possible only with the actual running video, here is link to original KAA release http://kickassanime.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=126 .
And here is the link to the post that contains links to the 450kbps encodes:
http://www.animea.net/forums/f25/mf-full-metal-panic-fumoffu-450kbps-h264-96kbps-aac-kaa-subs-20314/
Okay, I understand this is selfish. But I haven't been able to resolve the delima whether these 450kbps is worth downloading.
(I read the forum rules while singing in, and I don't think I am breaking any. But just in case, such a 'selfish' post isn't allowed....please tell me, i'll edit it)
So far review I got :
Before posting screenshots:
>I can't see how providing low-quality, re-encoded files is
>helpful for anyone. If you cannot see the difference in
>quality, you must be blind.
After posting screenshots (same reviewer)
>To be perfectly honest, I'm a bit surprised at the quality.
>However, what a screenshot cannot tell us is how it looks
>when there's movement.
Other reviews
>TBH, it looks almost the same. I think yours looks a little
>darker but it might just be my monitor.
later
>Wow, saw those pictures on a better monitor and I'm impressed.
>I might actually download them since I haven't even
>started to watch FMP yet.
>the screenshots look good but there is a diffrence i can
>see it quite clearly but im not sure other people will
>I see it, but it really isn't that bad.
>I also see it to, but hard to explain it. Wont matter at all
>if you watch the video for one minute, since your wont
>know how the original looked like.
>Yeah, screen looks good but....
>if somebody download only your re-encode ones,
>then people will feel that your encodes are the best
>ones just because that's the only version they've seen.
>But if you are re-encoding from another rip, there will
>always be a difference.
>For me there is no difference beetwen those two screens.
People that think there isn't appreciable/OR NO difference =2 (forums) + 2 (freinds)
People that think there is difference (including unspecified - appreciable or not)= 3
Neutral = 2
You may ask me, why didn't I post the original forum links. Well, I didn't want to look this like a attempt to humiliate fellow members (of the other forums). I can give the link if anyone wants.
You may ask me again, why did I post so many things. Well, that because you don't feel that I haven't done my homework on this.
I would be very thankful for reviews and criticism (even of the sort - you shouldn't have posted here.)
Thanks
http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1309975_yzddd/nic_Fumoffu_02.DVD_H26402-tn.png
One of the screenshot is of 450kbps one and another is of original KAA's release.
There is certainly difference in the two pictures. But I cannot find any appreciable difference, without magnification.
Since true quality test is possible only with the actual running video, here is link to original KAA release http://kickassanime.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=126 .
And here is the link to the post that contains links to the 450kbps encodes:
http://www.animea.net/forums/f25/mf-full-metal-panic-fumoffu-450kbps-h264-96kbps-aac-kaa-subs-20314/
Okay, I understand this is selfish. But I haven't been able to resolve the delima whether these 450kbps is worth downloading.
(I read the forum rules while singing in, and I don't think I am breaking any. But just in case, such a 'selfish' post isn't allowed....please tell me, i'll edit it)
So far review I got :
Before posting screenshots:
>I can't see how providing low-quality, re-encoded files is
>helpful for anyone. If you cannot see the difference in
>quality, you must be blind.
After posting screenshots (same reviewer)
>To be perfectly honest, I'm a bit surprised at the quality.
>However, what a screenshot cannot tell us is how it looks
>when there's movement.
Other reviews
>TBH, it looks almost the same. I think yours looks a little
>darker but it might just be my monitor.
later
>Wow, saw those pictures on a better monitor and I'm impressed.
>I might actually download them since I haven't even
>started to watch FMP yet.
>the screenshots look good but there is a diffrence i can
>see it quite clearly but im not sure other people will
>I see it, but it really isn't that bad.
>I also see it to, but hard to explain it. Wont matter at all
>if you watch the video for one minute, since your wont
>know how the original looked like.
>Yeah, screen looks good but....
>if somebody download only your re-encode ones,
>then people will feel that your encodes are the best
>ones just because that's the only version they've seen.
>But if you are re-encoding from another rip, there will
>always be a difference.
>For me there is no difference beetwen those two screens.
People that think there isn't appreciable/OR NO difference =2 (forums) + 2 (freinds)
People that think there is difference (including unspecified - appreciable or not)= 3
Neutral = 2
You may ask me, why didn't I post the original forum links. Well, I didn't want to look this like a attempt to humiliate fellow members (of the other forums). I can give the link if anyone wants.
You may ask me again, why did I post so many things. Well, that because you don't feel that I haven't done my homework on this.
I would be very thankful for reviews and criticism (even of the sort - you shouldn't have posted here.)
Thanks